Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
no huddle
Apr 27, 2016 10:35:51 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 10:35:51 GMT -6
We are trying to go 100% no huddle but are having a hard time creating signals that are simple and short. Our second problem is lining our receivers up and not having to slow down the tempo. Any ideas?
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Apr 27, 2016 10:37:13 GMT -6
Signals...doesnt matter what it is just create something...as for lining up receivers...what and how many formations do yall use?
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 10:39:11 GMT -6
If you have a lot of 2 way players, don't do it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
no huddle
Apr 27, 2016 10:39:16 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2016 10:39:16 GMT -6
Looking at mainly 4 different formations:
2x2 3x1 Te trips The 4th formation is going to be a hybrid with two backs, but multiple looks (IE h back, pistol, offset, etc) without having to move receivers much.
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Apr 27, 2016 10:41:35 GMT -6
that is easy...if in the middle of the field base out of 2x2 unless you want another formation then you will signal it in...on the hash be in TE trips or trips open...
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:42:03 GMT -6
If you have a lot of 2 way players, don't do it. Everyone knows my argument against being 100% no huddle. You are making it VERY easy on the DC to call the game. I have way more trouble calling the game against huddle teams. Even if I know the personnel grouping, there's no way to know the offensive structure. I have to guess in regards to pressure and 3x1 checks. No such problem vs no huddle.
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Apr 27, 2016 10:42:16 GMT -6
What kind of things are you having issues coming up with signals for?
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 10:42:43 GMT -6
yup
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Apr 27, 2016 10:43:12 GMT -6
I have always been no huddle...we are going to short huddle next year...
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:43:12 GMT -6
Now in terms of coming up with signals...let your players help. They will take ownership and THEY WON'T FORGET THEM!
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:43:57 GMT -6
I have always been no huddle...we are going to short huddle next year... Short huddle is harder to call against. WRs going to go ahead and line up?
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Apr 27, 2016 10:47:35 GMT -6
not sure yet...thought about having my outside receivers lined up and making the Y, F, and R huddle up with the Bigs...
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:48:56 GMT -6
not sure yet...thought about having my outside receivers lined up and making the Y, F, and R huddle up with the Bigs... That's what our guys do. Hides the offensive structure better than straight no huddle.
|
|
|
Post by gotemcoach on Apr 27, 2016 10:57:14 GMT -6
I used to be a big no huddle guy, now I prefer the short huddle going on first sound, sprinting to your spot and lets roll.....outside WR never huddle and stay on their side of the field
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Apr 27, 2016 11:16:54 GMT -6
Now in terms of coming up with signals...let your players help. They will take ownership and THEY WON'T FORGET THEM! GREAT POINT
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 11:57:16 GMT -6
yup. And sugar huddle does make things more difficult.
|
|
|
Post by Burnet44 on Apr 27, 2016 12:29:42 GMT -6
31 13 22 30 03 20 king 20 queen
|
|
|
no huddle
Apr 27, 2016 16:30:12 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by email on Apr 27, 2016 16:30:12 GMT -6
Is your king and queen for the "h" back?
|
|
|
Post by Burnet44 on Apr 27, 2016 17:45:03 GMT -6
yeah strong week or wide or boundry or use jack for te
|
|
|
no huddle
Apr 27, 2016 20:06:37 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by email on Apr 27, 2016 20:06:37 GMT -6
Gotcha
|
|