|
Post by blitz50 on May 4, 2017 7:27:46 GMT -6
I stand by my statement. It is officiated incorrectly. I don't blame the O guys. I blame the rule enforcement. I have no problem with the RPOs that are basically QG. Fair game. It's the ride ride ride then throw downfield BS that gets me. There's no grey area. It's cheating. I refuse to teach my DBs to hold when playing catch man. It's against the rules and I think it's unethical to teach a technique that you as a coach KNOW is against the rules. As a DC I hated RPO's. I'm switching to the dark side (offense) this next year and all my suggestions are we should run the piss out of RPO's. We should have an RPO off of every run.
|
|
|
Post by fbs on May 4, 2017 7:31:11 GMT -6
yeah I don't know a single defensive guy that likes rpo's, but until they fix the rule, you're a fool if you don't run them. a FOOL.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 8:33:38 GMT -6
I think RPO's are just the catchy phrase right now. Heck, our QB looks out and finds leverage with #2, throw the bubble. There... I guess we ran an RPO. That's what most HS guys are doing and saying "we run RPO's."
Reality is, I think very few people actually run true RPO's.
|
|
|
Post by fbs on May 4, 2017 8:36:02 GMT -6
I think RPO's are just the catchy phrase right now. Heck, our QB looks out and finds leverage with #2, throw the bubble. There... I guess we ran an RPO. That's what most HS guys are doing and saying "we run RPO's." Reality is, I think very few people actually run true RPO's. that's cute. how in the world can you know that? I can tell you that we run every rpo in the book, and it's not just a catchy phrase that will wear itself out. there's no better way to put the defense in conflict than to destroy all of their rules. now go get your shinebox.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 8:40:43 GMT -6
I think RPO's are just the catchy phrase right now. Heck, our QB looks out and finds leverage with #2, throw the bubble. There... I guess we ran an RPO. That's what most HS guys are doing and saying "we run RPO's." Reality is, I think very few people actually run true RPO's. that's cute. how in the world can you know that? I can tell you that we run every rpo in the book, and it's not just a catchy phrase that will wear itself out. there's no better way to put the defense in conflict than to destroy all of their rules. now go get your shinebox. Good for you. Just don't see a lot of HS qb's that can do it all post-snap. See lots of "pre-snap" checks. Like I said, the catchy phrase.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 8:44:06 GMT -6
Sounds like you are one of the few there FBS
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on May 4, 2017 8:52:01 GMT -6
We run RPO with post snap read. It's just extended triple option. Instead of a pitch, it's a short throw.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 8:53:26 GMT -6
We run RPO with post snap read. It's just extended triple option. Instead of a pitch, it's a short throw. Way different than a QB having to just step, look, and pitch. Way more moving parts. IMO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 8:53:48 GMT -6
We run RPO with post snap read. It's just extended triple option. Instead of a pitch, it's a short throw. What % of your offense has post snap reads?
|
|
|
Post by fbs on May 4, 2017 8:57:09 GMT -6
We run RPO with post snap read. It's just extended triple option. Instead of a pitch, it's a short throw. Way different than a QB having to just step, look, and pitch. Way more moving parts. IMO. there's no difference in concept. it's a short throw instead of a pitch and it's very easy. have you ever tried it, or are you just talking about something you don't know about?
|
|
|
Post by fbs on May 4, 2017 9:01:53 GMT -6
Sounds like you are one of the few there FBS I'm honestly shocked that this is a conversation. These things are so easy to use... yeah they take reps, but so does everything else. Why wouldn't you use them? When run correctly they guarantee you explosive plays.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 9:02:26 GMT -6
Similar concept. Way more moving parts. Good for you that you've mastered it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 9:02:38 GMT -6
A lateral and forward pass are two different concepts I thought
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 9:02:58 GMT -6
Sounds like you are one of the few there FBS I'm honestly shocked that this is a conversation. These things are so easy to use... yeah they take reps, but so does everything else. Why wouldn't you use them? When run correctly they guarantee you explosive plays. Iso run correctly guarantees explosive plays.
|
|
|
Post by fbs on May 4, 2017 9:05:10 GMT -6
are you both seriously this dense? this is freaking mind boggling. there's not WAY more moving parts... just a tad different. And yes, a lateral and a forward pass are different, but if you're going to split hairs just to attempt to validate yourself then gfy, you're a disgrace.
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on May 4, 2017 9:09:31 GMT -6
are you both seriously this dense? this is freaking mind boggling. there's not WAY more moving parts... just a tad different. And yes, a lateral and a forward pass are different, but if you're going to split hairs just to attempt to validate yourself then gfy, you're a disgrace. 😳🤣
|
|
|
Post by tcb on May 4, 2017 9:10:53 GMT -6
"Guy" at ESPN needs to go look at bowl results. ESPN no longer needs to be used a sports reference, in my opinion. Liberals, Lebron and SEC....that's all ESPN knows. agree thtas why they are bleeding money for Disney and fired a hundred I though the analogy was spot on btw Mark May should be fired dude is terrible Analogy isn't "spot on", in my opinion. Mahomes threw for 344 vs. Okie St, 586 vs. Baylor, and 734 vs. OU. Those three teams' defenses played great in bowl games vs. Boise, Colorado, and Auburn. ESPN is full of crap and they will talk badly about all conferences not named "SEC". I don't understand why it's hard for some people to admit that Mahomes is pretty dang good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2017 9:21:16 GMT -6
are you both seriously this dense? this is freaking mind boggling. there's not WAY more moving parts... just a tad different. And yes, a lateral and a forward pass are different, but if you're going to split hairs just to attempt to validate yourself then gfy, you're a disgrace. 😳🤣 Not splitting hairs, just asking a question. You calling dudes out that don't agree or are asking questions makes me think you are one of those board gurus.
|
|
|
Post by gotemcoach on May 4, 2017 9:24:18 GMT -6
Most of the RPO's we run here are post-snap reads
|
|
|
Post by tonymontana on May 4, 2017 9:26:50 GMT -6
FBS got guys worked up on several threads....like a Saturday night for Hitch!
|
|