|
|
Post by Lebowski on Nov 27, 2017 9:36:07 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Nov 27, 2017 9:45:09 GMT -6
Open the 94 Nebraska 1 back option playbook and look where they have an 8 technique.
|
|
|
|
Post by tonymontana on Nov 27, 2017 9:45:53 GMT -6
Cool
|
|
|
|
Post by Burnet44 on Nov 27, 2017 12:28:18 GMT -6
Huskers were big roid users
then the NCAA started drug testing
they havent been the same since
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Nov 27, 2017 13:27:05 GMT -6
My point on the post is that some of the Okies didn't know what an 8 technique is/was/is.
Some said they've never heard of an 8 technique. Guess they are dam young.
|
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Nov 27, 2017 13:40:38 GMT -6
Open the 94 Nebraska 1 back option playbook and look where they have an 8 technique. Yup. Have heard it called an 8 or a ghost 9(usually only called this when there is no TE. Have seen a lot of 8 techs played at h3ll line of the other d'linemen. reading the TE block. To tell the truth, haven't heard anybody talk about 8 techs since I was in Texas. We used to use the terminology all the time when i was in HS. |
|
|
|
Post by tcb on Nov 28, 2017 6:23:19 GMT -6
sorry, thought this was going to be about the coaches office at crooked oak....stud will see himself out... Hahahaha....nice! |
|
|
|
Post by Burnet44 on Nov 28, 2017 12:57:21 GMT -6
yeah like a wide tackle 6
that all of you will have to google
ran that d for 10 years
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Nov 28, 2017 13:39:34 GMT -6
Not all of us will have to google that. I've been around the block as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Nov 29, 2017 11:07:13 GMT -6
yeah like a wide tackle 6 that all of you will have to google ran that d for 10 years We ran some split 6 this year...no wide tackle 6... |
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Nov 29, 2017 11:09:21 GMT -6
Wide tackle 6 goes back a long time. We ran it in jr. hi. I was one of the 2 inside backers.
I cut my teeth in the beginning of my coaching career in the split 6, or 'split' defense.
All the pass happy offenses got folks out of that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Nov 29, 2017 11:11:46 GMT -6
I remember when the 4-2-5 was all the rage. Basic 'split' principles....
|
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Nov 29, 2017 11:12:48 GMT -6
In the split you have 4 DL's, 2 ILB, 2 OLB, 3 secondary.
In the 4-2-5, you have 4 DL's, 2 ILB, 5 secondary.
Same basic concepts, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Nov 29, 2017 11:15:23 GMT -6
In the split you have 4 DL's, 2 ILB, 2 OLB, 3 secondary. In the 4-2-5, you have 4 DL's, 2 ILB, 5 secondary. Same basic concepts, IMHO. Its a personnel thing. Usually your 2 OLBs in the split will do what 2 of your secondary will do in the 4-2-5, just might be better run stoppers. If you put better secondary, then you are talking nickle packages etc. |
|
|
|
Post by TOBC on Nov 29, 2017 11:58:33 GMT -6
In the split you have 4 DL's, 2 ILB, 2 OLB, 3 secondary. In the 4-2-5, you have 4 DL's, 2 ILB, 5 secondary. Same basic concepts, IMHO. so split is what you call a 4-4? |
|
|
|
Post by TOBC on Nov 29, 2017 11:59:17 GMT -6
it don't have shat on stud's arkansas stack monster though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Burnet44 on Nov 29, 2017 12:44:18 GMT -6
 wide tackle 6 isnt a split |
|
|
|
Post by skinny51 on Nov 29, 2017 12:50:43 GMT -6
Yes it’s a different alignment than the split 6...
|
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Nov 29, 2017 13:09:45 GMT -6
it don't have shat on stud's arkansas stack monster though. Wish we had that for the hall of fame. Funny stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Nov 29, 2017 13:09:59 GMT -6
And Bazinga.
|
|
