|
Post by TOBC on Feb 5, 2018 8:46:10 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Feb 5, 2018 15:50:56 GMT -6
They should have their own districts and playoffs. Texas has TAPPS.
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Feb 5, 2018 15:52:27 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by 72blue on Feb 5, 2018 16:03:11 GMT -6
To me, the problem is not just the private schools. The more pressing issues are
1) athletes hopping between schools in multi hs districts (OKC, Moore, etc...) 2) small schools in metro districts that compete in smaller classes benefiting from said athlete hopping. 3) the free agent market that exists because of the short sighted rule to make your eligibility start with your freshman year.
Private schools are easy targets, and they no doubt have competitive advantages that are unfair, but they are not the only issue.
Discuss...
|
|
|
Post by blitz50 on Feb 6, 2018 8:59:26 GMT -6
To me, the problem is not just the private schools. The more pressing issues are 1) athletes hopping between schools in multi hs districts (OKC, Moore, etc...) 2) small schools in metro districts that compete in smaller classes benefiting from said athlete hopping. 3) the free agent market that exists because of the short sighted rule to make your eligibility start with your freshman year. Private schools are easy targets, and they no doubt have competitive advantages that are unfair, but they are not the only issue. Discuss... 1. I think this is more of a hindrance than an advantage. Having worked in the Metro area, that is my opinion. 2. Again see 1. Very few schools if any get any benefit from this. And as far as small schools go, it is really a disadvantage. Also, all schools have move ins and move outs. Sometimes it helps you, sometimes it hurts you. 3. This rule doesn't bother me. Once they establish eligibility, they have to stay at said school or face the year sit out.
|
|