|
Post by Hands11 on Apr 27, 2016 9:42:11 GMT -6
Dip, also pay particular attention to the leverage of the nickel here as well.
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 9:46:06 GMT -6
I was looking at that. Good stuff fellas.
|
|
|
Post by Lebowski on Apr 27, 2016 9:47:42 GMT -6
We play same alignment as Nickle and Corner we 2 read them. Align FS over the Center looking for #3 Align Sam splitting #2 and #3 while Mike and Will are in 30 backers. Man the single side. We call it 4 jump
|
|
|
Post by Hitch on Apr 27, 2016 9:48:58 GMT -6
Palms?...........
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 9:49:02 GMT -6
Dip, also pay particular attention to the leverage of the nickel here as well. Basically pretend to play 10 on 10. Nickel back has same leverage as a corner would. I like it.
|
|
|
Post by Hands11 on Apr 27, 2016 9:52:29 GMT -6
No your corner "would" still have inside leverage on 1 in palms if he wasn't manning him up
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 9:55:25 GMT -6
No your corner "would" still have inside leverage on 1 in palms if he wasn't manning him up Yes...
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 9:56:12 GMT -6
Really? Why would a corner give up outside leverage unless it was in the no-coverage zone? Now you are giving up access to the sideline, aren't you?
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:06:28 GMT -6
Really? Why would a corner give up outside leverage unless it was in the no-coverage zone? Now you are giving up access to the sideline, aren't you? Corner plays inside leverage for quick game. Don't see very many QBs threatening us with the out to the field.
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:07:21 GMT -6
Not to mention the jacked up route stems we'd get from the WRs if we played outside leverage.
|
|
|
Post by Hands11 on Apr 27, 2016 10:07:35 GMT -6
Really? Why would a corner give up outside leverage unless it was in the no-coverage zone? Now you are giving up access to the sideline, aren't you? No, if 1 runs vertical I've got him. Just like if it was cover 3 or 4. Only thing that takes me off of one is an out by 2. By the time 2 breaks on his out my safety is over the top of one. That's the pattern match you are looking for.
|
|
|
Post by Hands11 on Apr 27, 2016 10:08:25 GMT -6
Not to mention the jacked up route stems we'd get from the WRs if we played outside leverage. HAHAHAHA!!! YOU DAD GUM RIGHT!!! We could have some fun!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:08:40 GMT -6
Really? Why would a corner give up outside leverage unless it was in the no-coverage zone? Now you are giving up access to the sideline, aren't you? No, if 1 runs vertical I've got him. Just like if it was cover 3 or 4. Only thing that takes me off of one is an out by 2. By the time 2 breaks on his out my safety is over the top of one. That's the pattern match you are looking for. All of #1 vertical
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:09:19 GMT -6
Not to mention the jacked up route stems we'd get from the WRs if we played outside leverage. HAHAHAHA!!! YOU DAD GUM RIGHT!!! We could have some fun!!!!! That would put some pressure on the safeties!
|
|
|
Post by Hands11 on Apr 27, 2016 10:10:41 GMT -6
Not to mention you would get bubbled to death!!
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:12:13 GMT -6
Not to mention you would get bubbled to death!! Also a good reason you play the nickel in outside leverage.
|
|
|
Post by Hands11 on Apr 27, 2016 10:13:03 GMT -6
Exaclty!
|
|
|
Post by kennywayne9 on Apr 27, 2016 10:13:39 GMT -6
Bubble killer.
|
|
|
Post by xdipster on Apr 27, 2016 10:15:23 GMT -6
OK. Makes sense. Good stuff.
|
|